WOOD
This is a copy of an article published in
The Peak Advertiser, the Peak District's local free newspaper,
on 3rd September 2001,
reproduced by kind permission of the author, the late Desmond Holden.
The “What's in a Name” series was a regular
feature in the Advertiser over the period 1993‑2004,
taking a refreshing look at the derivation of some typically
Derbyshire surnames.
Articles are confined to the origins and meanings of surnames,
and do not indicate any particular interest on Desmond's part in
the genealogy, descent, or family history of individuals bearing
the surnames featured.
Editor's Note: Articles are provided for general interest and
background only. They are not intended to provide an exhaustive treatise
for any individual family history - investigations of which may yield
quite different results. Or, in Desmond's own words:
“In the end it must remain with individual bearers of the names to
draw upon family traditions and to seek out such documentary
evidence as is available to decide the matter for themselves.”
WHAT'S IN A NAME …
Are you called WOOD?
(Part One)
Woodland, Woodman, Woodward etc.
After setting aside the numerous permutations on the name
"Wood" it still remains one of the most widely distributed
surnames in the kingdom. The local directory contains over
600 entries.
Because woods were a vital element in the medieval economy,
the number of plantations even within a small neighbourhood
was considerable. They provided fuel for domestic and
industrial use (charcoal for smelting), fencing, gates,
poles, ladders, furniture as well as building. There are so
many "Woods" that, as in the case of bearers of like
surnames, such as "Hill" or "Brook" it is now almost
impossible for families called "Wood" to trace their specific
origins.
It helps somewhat if the surname can be related to some
identifiable plantation such as "Moorwood", which is near
South Wingfield and mentioned as early as 1154. But
establishing a woodland was a continuing process and some
sites are named after later landowners, and if they too have
a "wood" name, there is no connection as in the case of
"Littlewood" near Moreley, first appearing as late as 1786.
Since there are more than 300 sites in Britain incorporating
the unit "wood" [and that] 38 of which are in Derbyshire,
[and that] attempts to suggest meanings for them all would
convert this feature into a gazetteer, [then] selectivity is
inevitable and mostly names appearing in the local directory
will be noted.
In Old English "wood" appears as "wudu" and has corresponding
forms in the languages of the northern regions of Europe.
(Ved-Norway: Gwydd-Wales). It evolved independently in the
basic language and no transitions can be traced from earlier
sources such as Sanskrit. It had a wider meaning than today
since most of the landscape was thickly covered in woods and
forests. It first appears in 825 where a translation of Psalm
104, verse 11 is given as "alle wilddeor wudu", which now
reads as "every beast of the field".
As a surname the earliest references are, in England, to
"Walter de la Wode" (Hereford: 1242) and in Scotland, to
"William Wod" (Kilravock, Nairn - 1295). It seems that the
name became so widespread that it was not unusual to add an
occupational name as well. Hence in York "Thomas del Wode"
(1378) is noted as being a "smythe" and his neighbour
"Robertus del Wodde" (1379) as a "webster" (weaver). It
should be noted that the earliest entries invariably carry
prepositions such as "by" or "in" or "of the". These were
later dropped but some were assimilated, providing another
range of surnames such as "Attwood", "Inwood" "Dillwood" etc.
As a surname "Wood" was widely applicable to anybody who
dwelt in the vicinity of a plantation or who worked there in
some capacity. On the other hand "Woodland" was a little more
specific and described a family which actually dwelt amidst
the trees. Curiously, though, it is not noted for Scotland.
The earliest record is to "Henry de Wudeland" (Lincoln:
1195).
There is some doubt over "Woodrow" but since the early
records tend to be concentrated in restricted neighbourhoods,
it seems that here "row" describes a line of cottages
provided for the accommodation of workers. Thus in Sussex
(1154) neighbours sharing the name "Woderue" are named
successively. In Scotland the term seems to have settled on
an overseer of workers in a plantation and is found as in the
case of "John Woodroffe" (Glasgow: 1505). An especial problem
here is that there are several places called "Woodrow", any
one of which could have generated the surname. As a place-name,
though, it means "the path through the wood" and
families called "Woodrow" must decide for themselves. For
reference the sites noted are in Melksham (Wilts.), Amersham
(Bucks.), Kidderminster (Worcs.), Fifehead and Haselbury
(Dorset) and another district near Leeds.
It is the practice to plant trees on a hill-side or on
sloping ground to prevent erosion. This practice was so
well-observed by our medieval ancestors that there are over 50
major habitations listed in the gazetteer as well as
innumerable neighbourhood names.
Here, since the majority of land-owners were Norman and spoke
only French, there was a tendency to use that language first
then to adopt English and this leads to a duplication of
surnames. Families associated with "Woodside" at Bolsover or
at Ripley might have been registered as living in "bosco de
Bollisovere" or "bosco de Rippel" and designated "de Bosco"
or "de Bois" which generated the surname "Boys" or "Boyce".
Otherwise the earliest record of the English form is in
Cumberland and is to a "Robert del Wodsid" (1332) and in
Scotland to a "James" (1550). He definitely took his name
from "Woodside" in the parish of Beith, Ayrshire.
The economic importance of medieval woodlands is further
demonstrated from the number of occupational names relating
to them. The supervisor or "guard" or "ward" of the woods in
a certain district was called the "wood-ward" and this
provides the corresponding surname - hence "Sewhal le
wudeward" (Hampshire: 1208).
This name is well-represented locally with over 200 entries
in the directory. The name "Woodman" (also included in the
directory) looks almost self-explanatory - ie. the man who
works in the plantation, but, caution! Surnames are not
always what they seem. It was indistinguishable from another
occupational name relating to a man who was a dyer or seller
of dyes - that is "woad" and hence was called a "Woad-man".
Both surnames ended up as "Woodman".
Here, mention of the fact that some surnames have unexpected
meanings provides a suitable place at which to pause and to
take up the name "Wood" again in the following issue of the
"Advertiser". The result may be surprising!
To be continued...
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 3rd September 2001.
|
Are you called WOOD?
(Part Two - Woody)
The preceding article ended by saying that some surnames have
an unexpected significance. This is certainly the case with
Wood. As a starter, during the Middle Ages, since wood was
just about the only material available in a few specialist
situations - wine, for example, is aged in wood. A remarkable
relic is still in use with the reference to the Cross or a
Crucifix. This was frequently spoken of as the wood. Note the
words of the Hymn by J.M. Neale (Good King Wenceslas) his
precious body, broke on the Wood. Hence the formula we often
employ to ward off misfortune: "Touch wood!"
From an investigation of the old registers of surnames, it is
interesting to note that under Wood some entries indicated
that the bearers live by or in the Wood (e.g. Gilbert a la
Wode of Worchester, 1275) while others are simply designated
as Wood (e.g. Richard Wod of Somerset, 1230). The question
is: Why should Gilbert be described as one who dwelt in a
wood whereas Richard appears to be equated with lumber?
The answer is that in the medieval vocabulary wood not only
meant a collection of trees but also "mad" or, at best,
simple-minded. So poor Richard might have been the village
idiot!
The word is no longer part of current English but it remains
in modern German as "Wut" (rage, fury, tantrums) and wuten
(to storm, to rage). In a curious roundabout way it can be
discerned in the name of the fifth day of the week,
Wednesday. While it is commonplace learning that it is
derived from the name of the Teutonic god called Woden, the
origin of his name is less understood.
Although the point is not perfectly settled in points of
detail, it was believed that during the tempestuous hours of
darkness, the ghosts of warriors slain in battle rode across
the clouds. They were called the Furious Army or The Savage
Riders. Their leader was called Wode which signifies The
Furious One.
In Old English the word for mad or furious or frenzied was
wad and so it is easy to see how it became confused with wode
which meant a plantation.
The old meaning may also be noted in the name of the bird -
the Woodcock. Apparently it was so easily lured into traps
that it passed into being a nickname for a simpleton.
Shakespeare says (Taming of Shrew: Act I Sc. 2: "O this
woodcock! What an ass it is!" (1594). However the name is so
widespread so it must be taken that not every man who was
called Woodcock was not very bright - as William Wudecoch of
Norfolk (1175). The name could very well be a location name
as well, such as Woodcote which means "The dwelling amidst
the trees."
The Gazetteer lists about 20 sites. The best known bearer was
Bruce Woodcock whom older readers will remember as a boxing
hopeful in the 1940's.
The earliest instance of the expression is to be found in a
sort of Old English/Latin Dictionary compiled in 725. There
Wode is set alongside epilenticus which is an old term for
epileptic. A similar use of wad or wet (to be mad) occurs in
the Anglo Saxon version of St. John's Gospel (Chap. X, verse
20) "Deofol is on him and he wet" which in modern form is "He
hath a Devil and is mad."
This accords with the medieval notion that evil or
mischievous spirits were able to take over the bodies of
people and to cause them to run amok or to behave
irrationally. Little was understood of the range of mental
afflictions and until comparatively modern times all
epileptics, depressives, schizophrenics etc, were categorised
mad or formerly as wud.
In many cases, no doubt, mental infirmity was sufficiently
mild to allow its victims to remain in the community and not
to be shut away. They were probably nothing more than
simple-minded or just slow. Hence it is not surprising that they
were nick-named wod and from which a corresponding surname
eventually emerged. An attested instance occurred in
Worchester
[Ed: Worcester?] in 1221 where Adam Le Wode
or Adam the mad is still something of a folk memory.
An echo of its former use remains in everyday modern English
when we say mad to signify annoyance. "I wasn't half mad with
the car this morning. It wouldn't start." Readers of
Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream (Act II, Scene 2) will
recall how Demetrius says "Here am I and wood within the
wood", which shows the word as still understood as annoyed
even in Elizabethan times. Chaucer uses it to signify rash
desires, as when he says(in modern idiom): Covetousness is
always ill-judged.
Nevertheless it seems that wud was going out of use by the
beginning of the 17th century, especially in the south of
England. A travel book issued in 1627 stated: "In the
Northern Parts of England, when they think a man is
distracted or in a frenzy, they will say the man is Wood".
There certainly doesn't seem to have been any shortage of
characters in medieval society who were deemed wood by their
neighbours. There also seems to have been a slight trend
towards the, use of Woody or Woodey in the northern counties.
Hence Geoffrey Wody in Northumberland (1275) and Walter
Woodey in Lancashire (1300) and a Richard le Wod in Dorset
(1298).
In Scotland there was to be found a William Wod in Nairn
(1296). It is probably only a coincidence but the earliest
name mentioned in the Standard National Biographies is that
of John Wood or Wode. He wrote a remarkable treatise on
Mental Disorders in 1596.
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 17th September 2001.
|