RANGELEY
This is a copy of an article published in
The Peak Advertiser, the Peak District's local free newspaper,
on 2nd August 1993,
reproduced by kind permission of the author, the late Desmond Holden.
The “What's in a Name” series was a regular
feature in the Advertiser over the period 1993‑2004,
taking a refreshing look at the derivation of some typically
Derbyshire surnames.
Articles are confined to the origins and meanings of surnames,
and do not indicate any particular interest on Desmond's part in
the genealogy, descent, or family history of individuals bearing
the surnames featured.
Editor's Note: Articles are provided for general interest and
background only. They are not intended to provide an exhaustive treatise
for any individual family history - investigations of which may yield
quite different results. Or, in Desmond's own words:
“In the end it must remain with individual bearers of the names to
draw upon family traditions and to seek out such documentary
evidence as is available to decide the matter for themselves.”
WHAT'S IN A NAME …
Are you called RANGELEY?
A reader, now living in Ashover and formerly of Great Longstone has
approached the "Peak Advertiser" for information about his own
name - "Rangeley". It has to be said, straightaway, that nothing
definitive can be said about most names unless early records remain
and can be consulted. The spelling of many a name has modified over
the centuries and the particular meaning is lost unless an old
example can be found giving the name as originally written. Then
one can compare the form of spelling with that used for similar
words of the time and, hopefully, deduce its true origin.
That note of caution having been entered, we can begin confidently
enough by noting that the unit "-ley" is frequently found in place-
names and so it is reasonable to suppose that "Rangeley" is a
habitation name: that is to say, it would have been used to denote
a group or a family of settlers who lived in a particular "lea" -
that is, a meadow or an open-space.
The next thing, though is: What does "Range" mean? And there we
have a problem! Without access to original records - assuming, that
is, that they still exist - the significance of the unit "Range-"
must ever remain a matter of various surmises. The most picturesque
suggestion is that the name was originally "Ring Ley" and that the
"ring" in this case was some prehistoric stone circle of which
there are many examples in our part of the world. Hence persons now
bearing the name "Rangeley" could have descended from ancestors who
occupied a settlement where there was such a Stone Circle and known
locally as "the place of the Circle" or "the Ring Lea" and from
which they ultimately took their identity.
Although this particular reader hails from Great Longstone where
there are various examples of Prehistoric Workings, that fact
provides, at best, only plausible colouring and the suggested
origin is not unanswerable. For instance, it is not easy to show
how the "-i-" in the word "ring" could have modulated into "-a-"
and end up as "range".
A better explanation lies in that the unit "range" is derived from
the Anglo-Saxon "hrung" which had several meanings, including a
"cudgel" or "stout walking-stick". The "sticks" used in the
construction of ladders - i.e. the "rungs" can be traced to this
source. So it is feasible that certain tracts of land could have
been set aside for the cultivation and coppicing of suitable trees
to provide materials for cudgels for the use of our ancestors -
very desirable in those troublesome times.
From this circumstance it is possible that the early inhabitants of
"an open space where trees were grown for cudgels" adopted, or were
given the name "Cudgel Field" or "Range Lea". Some credibility can
be given to this suggestion in that where the unit "Range" appears
in a place-name it is connected with the planting of trees for
staves and cudgels. The place in Gloucester, called "Rangeworthy"
has a name derived from old words meaning "the enclosure built of
stakes".
Even so, a still more acceptable explanation seems to be found in
the fact that the original "Range Lea" could have been a site given
over to weapon-training and tournaments. At a time when most of
England was heavily forested, open spaces would have been
appreciated for the opportunities they could provide where local
people might practise self-defence - again, very necessary when law
enforcement and the protection of person and property was more or
less left to the principle of Self Help! As has been mentioned
before, the word "range" has many meanings, some of them now
discontinued, and one such meaning was descriptive of open spaces
used for friendly combats and jousting. It is frequently found, as
one might expect, in old narratives setting forth the exploits of
King Arthur. So it is quite possible that the predecessors of the
present-day "Rangeley" people lived near a site which was
a sort of "Training ground" for local inhabitants. In spite of its
undeniable similarity, the name "Rangeley" cannot be linked with
anything to do with "Rangers" - i.e. those who patrol.
The name seems to be highly localised and only two examples can be found
in the local directories and it does not appear in any of the Standard
Biographical Dictionaries.
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 2nd August 1993.
|