MANSFIELD
This is a copy of an article published in
The Peak Advertiser, the Peak District's local free newspaper,
on 21st February 1994,
reproduced by kind permission of the author, the late Desmond Holden.
The “What's in a Name” series was a regular
feature in the Advertiser over the period 1993‑2004,
taking a refreshing look at the derivation of some typically
Derbyshire surnames.
Articles are confined to the origins and meanings of surnames,
and do not indicate any particular interest on Desmond's part in
the genealogy, descent, or family history of individuals bearing
the surnames featured.
Editor's Note: Articles are provided for general interest and
background only. They are not intended to provide an exhaustive treatise
for any individual family history - investigations of which may yield
quite different results. Or, in Desmond's own words:
“In the end it must remain with individual bearers of the names to
draw upon family traditions and to seek out such documentary
evidence as is available to decide the matter for themselves.”
WHAT'S IN A NAME …
Are you called MANSFIELD?
At first sight the origins of this name seem obvious. If is is, of
course, a location name, taken from "Mansfield" in Nottinghamshire
and must mean "the field of Man". But on reflection one is then
obliged to ask the question: Who, or what, is "Man"? And that is
not as obvious as it seems.
The second unit of the name, "-field" is straight forward. It has
already been encountered under "Oldfield" (13th December) and
means "open country", distinguishing it from "woodland" and is not
to be understood as referring to the measured acres with defined
boundaries such as are known today. Indeed this could hardly be the
case, because "Mansfield" is mentioned in chronicles considerably
pre-dating the introduction of the closed field system.
The first unit of the name, "Mans-", is, however, not straight
forward. There are several paths which can be followed and most of
them lead nowhere! The problem is that "Man" is an old word which
has or had more meanings than just "member of the human race".
Furthermore, place names reveal a puzzling interchange between
"Mans-" and "Man-", For example, "Mansfield" is found not only in
two places in Nottinghamshire, but also in Scotland (Ayr and Louth)
whereas there is "Manfield" in North Yorkshire.
The intermediate "-s-" can be significant, and it involves
considerable research to discover if that letter was originally
part of the name, has subsequently dropped out or was added later.
Its absence is important. In the case of "Manfield" the unit "man"
is derived from a word which meant "open and uninterrupted expanse
of territory". It survives in the expression "the Mainland" meaning
the wide view of land which can be observed on board ship at sea.
Hence in that case, it is a doubling-up of the name, and in modern
terms signifies "common land".
"Mansfield" is another matter entirely. It is certainly an old name
and is recorded as early as the 12th century, The place itself was
already important during Anglo-Saxon times and many Royal
Households assembled there, and continued to do so until about the
time of the Tudors. This would have led to a lot of movement and
local land-workers and servants, who would naturally adopt the name
"Mansfield", might have been taken or sent to other parts of the
country.
This probably explains why it is so widely distributed all over the
British Isles - even in Ireland, In those days you were looked upon
as nothing more than part of your Overlord's property and could be
moved around as if you were a piece of furniture. Until quite
modern times, in Nottingham, the miners were treated as part of the
mine and bought and sold along with it. when it changed hands!
There is not sufficient space to discuss all the possible origins
of the name. For example, it is quite likely that so important a
site could have been the setting for many a desperate conflict, now
lost in the mists of history. An extremely old word for "evil" is
"man" and it could have been that such events remained in folk
memory and that "Mansfield" could have been interpreted as "the
Field of Conflict" or "the place where evil deeds were done"! Still
that is rather too fanciful and romantic to be seriously
entertained. It is mentioned principally to illustrate an unusual
application of the word "man".
The meaning which seems the most convincing lies within the fact
"man" that is found in many old languages and means "rock" or
"boulder" or "stone". It occurs as "men" in Breton (which was
settled by the Ancient Britons, hence the name "Brittany"); in
Welsh as "Caen"; in Cornish as "medn" while in the North of England
a cairn of stones is still called a "man". The region around
Mansfield is noted for Ancient Stone Monuments and so it is
perfectly feasible to suggest that later settlers gave it a name
indicating that it was a "place where there are many stones" -
meaning, of course, distinctive stones, now identified as having
been set up or placed by former communities. As time went by, these
later inhabitants adopted the name "Mansfield" and today, many
people bearing it can certainly take it that they have descended
from ancestors who identified themselves as "dwellers in the open
space where great stones are found".
The most celebrated person under the name, however, came from
Scotland and he alternated the spelling between "Manfield" and
"Mansfield". He began life as "William Canfield" (1705-1793) and
then adopted "Mansfield" when he became Lord Chief Justice - an
Office he held with almost unrivalled distinction.
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 21st February 1994.
|