ISHERWOOD
This is a copy of an article published in
The Peak Advertiser, the Peak District's local free newspaper,
on 29th September 1997,
reproduced by kind permission of the author, the late Desmond Holden.
The “What's in a Name” series was a regular
feature in the Advertiser over the period 1993‑2004,
taking a refreshing look at the derivation of some typically
Derbyshire surnames.
Articles are confined to the origins and meanings of surnames,
and do not indicate any particular interest on Desmond's part in
the genealogy, descent, or family history of individuals bearing
the surnames featured.
Editor's Note: Articles are provided for general interest and
background only. They are not intended to provide an exhaustive treatise
for any individual family history - investigations of which may yield
quite different results. Or, in Desmond's own words:
“In the end it must remain with individual bearers of the names to
draw upon family traditions and to seek out such documentary
evidence as is available to decide the matter for themselves.”
WHAT'S IN A NAME …
Are you called ISHERWOOD?
Although this is a location-based surname and belongs very much to
the North-West, it has never appeared on any map because it
vanished without a trace round about the tenth century. A popular
explanation for such "lost villages" is that all the inhabitants
fell victims to the plague. In fact the list of places which are
known to have been totally wiped out is short and "Isherwood"
could not have been included otherwise the name would have
perished with it. Instead it still survives and is borne by many
families in Lancashire. It is especially concentrated in the
triangle formed by Blackburn, Oldham and Ormskirk.
The area is strongly associated with the Norsemen and there are
many reminders of their way of life and their beliefs. There is,
rather significantly, a Druidical Circle, 5 miles north of Bolton,
a town which has been mentioned as a possible locating point for
Isherwood. The Christian Missionaries encouraged their converts to
reject objects of their former Pagan reverence - as, for example,
cutting down Oak trees dedicated to Thor.
It is known that the Ash tree was especially sacred to the
Norsemen because in their mythology it is recounted that the Gods
created the first man out of its trunk. Since "Isherwood" does
actually mean the "Ash Wood" or, possibly, "The Ash Grove", it is
tempting to fabricate a story that such plantation was
deliberately destroyed and the site allowed to pass out of memory
as a blow against superstition. However that is a piece of
romantic speculation which, while not entirely incredible, should
be deferred to something more mundane.
The village most certainly had vanished even before the arrival of
the Normans because it is not included in the Domesday Survey
(1086). This omission is meaningful when set against the little
known historical event known as "The Harrying of the North".
(1069-71) This involved the wholesale slaughter and the
destruction of settlements throughout the most of northern England
by William I to consolidate his very questionable claims to the
English crown.
Unlike southern England, which had readily submitted to the
invaders, the north stood up for itself and William decided to
teach it a lesson. The contemporary chronicler, Orderic Vitalis
tells us how, "from York to Durham there was not a single
inhabited village as far as the eye could see and nothing moved in
the scorched ruins of villages but packs of wolves and wild dogs".
He estimated that over 100,000 people perished and a modern
historian says that nothing like it, not even during the fearful
carnage of the Wars of Religion, was ever to be seen again until
the "Holocaust".
No doubt had such a calamity been visited upon the southern half
of England we would have never heard the end of it, but because it
was merely the north which suffered, it has been conveniently
disregarded.
That somewhat extended commentary was needed because such places
as had been destroyed were noted in the Domesday Survey (1086) as
"Vasta est" - that is, "It has been laid waste". Hence it is
reasonable to assume that if the activities of William had
extended into this area and that had all the inhabitants been put
to the sword during the "Harrying", then there would have been
nobody left to carry the name forward.
The conclusion is, then, that site had long been abandoned and
that the inhabitants had dispersed to other places continuing its
identity in the surnames they were given by their new neighbours.
At this point it is now desirable to correct a widespread
misconception as to the nature of Early Mediaeval villages. They
were nothing like those or a later date - there was nothing of the
"Cranford" or "Ambridge" about them. There were small, occupied by
a few dozen people, frequently interrelated, all living in
scattered hovels, roughly constructed of tree-loppings and turf.
As the local resources were used up, the entire community would
simply shift to the nearest convenient site and built new
dwellings, leaving the old ones to fall down. After a while all
evidence on the ground of their former habitations would have
vanished but modern aerial photography and skilled excavation has
brought such movements to light. While traces of former
settlements can be picked out this way and be shown to have moved
round regularly, others, sadly must have been wholly abandoned,
remained concealed and then forgotten for centuries!
Nevertheless, the finding of any "lost village" does not always
tell us why or how it came to disappear nor even what its original
name might have been. Even if the site of "Isherwood" were to be
re-discovered, there is now very little chance that it would be
identified as such. Apart from a hazy tradition that it might have
been somewhere in the moorlands above Bolton, there is nothing
more to go on.
Most significant of all the facts available is that the name has
persisted. This must have been brought about from the fact that
members of that community emigrated to other places in the
vicinity. There were marked out by their new neighbours as having
come from "Isherwood" and that ultimately became their surname.
It also suggests that the decline of the village was steady,
otherwise there could not have been an identifiable place, still
inhabited, as a point of reference to identify the new-comers
among their fellow workers. And, since it is usually the young and
active who leave their native places, and it is the old and infirm
who must remain, one must ask why.
The most likely explanation is that the site, particularly if it
really were in the moorlands, was over-farmed, the soils became
exhausted, there was little room to move around and it could no
longer support its inhabitants.
Although statistics are scanty there is evidence that weather
changes were widespread in the decades before the Norman Conquest.
Apart from pollen counts taken from material removed from
excavated sites, Anglo-Saxon poetry makes telling allusions to the
dreadful climate - late frosts, skies perpetually overcast and
fierce summer gales. Agriculture was not carried out
scientifically and mediaeval peasants pushed the limited resources
to their limits and then, if possible, moved to another site.
In restricted locations, and on the moors perhaps, where
productive land was to be found only in small pockets, it has been
demonstrated that it needed only two successive bad seasons to
destroy a community. In the first bad year poor harvests would
seriously restrict the reserves needed to sustain livestock
through the winter and there was no alternative but to slaughter
all but the minimum of future breeding stock and make serious
inroads into seed corn. If there was another bad year following,
all livestock would have to be slaughtered and all reserves
consumed by people in a desperate attempt to stave off starvation.
Probably against such a perilous background younger inhabitants
had given up the struggle and taken themselves off to the more
favourable settlements leaving the old folk to manage as best they
could. Then, during a severe winter, perhaps, half-starved and
vulnerable to numerous ailments, the remainder simply perished.
Those belonging to them returned only to bury the dead and
retrieve what few pathetic possessions might be left and then
abandoned the site forever.
The name must have lingered in folk memory for long enough,
however, because it arises in the records for Lancashire where
mention is made to both a William de Yserwude (1246) and an Adam
de Esherwode (1332). The inclusion of "-d-" ("of") is important
since it shows that the site, even if lost, was still recollected.
Some 200 years later it appears as "Ussherwode" and "Usshewood"
(1524) but by the end of the century (1594) it emerges as
"Isherwood", and, after a mention of a James Isherwood of Whalley
in 1605 the spelling is finalised in its present form.
The name is heavily identified with Lancashire and, within the
triangle already mentioned, the local directories muster over 1000
entries. Yet once outside that area the numbers perceptibly drop.
There is only a handful in the Peak, in Merseyside and in the
entire London Area.
Of the personalities bearing the name, all are northerners - Sir
Joseph Isherwood (1870-1937) the shipping engineer, and
Christopher Isherwood (1904-1986) the writer. Here in Bakewell
the name is known to many of us on account of our own Dr.
Isherwood at the Medical Centre.
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 29th September 1997.
|