GILL
This is a copy of an article published in
The Peak Advertiser, the Peak District's local free newspaper,
on 4th November 2002,
reproduced by kind permission of the author, the late Desmond Holden.
The “What's in a Name” series was a regular
feature in the Advertiser over the period 1993‑2004,
taking a refreshing look at the derivation of some typically
Derbyshire surnames.
Articles are confined to the origins and meanings of surnames,
and do not indicate any particular interest on Desmond's part in
the genealogy, descent, or family history of individuals bearing
the surnames featured.
Editor's Note: Articles are provided for general interest and
background only. They are not intended to provide an exhaustive treatise
for any individual family history - investigations of which may yield
quite different results. Or, in Desmond's own words:
“In the end it must remain with individual bearers of the names to
draw upon family traditions and to seek out such documentary
evidence as is available to decide the matter for themselves.”
WHAT'S IN A NAME …
Are you called GILL?
(Part One)
A reader in Tideswell asks about this name.
It is willingly conceded that this name is difficult to
analyse. However one relevant point can be dealt with
immediately. It is not related to the expression 'Farmer
Giles' who is traditionally regarded as the typical British
agriculturalist. The use of that name dates only from 1800. A
minor poet, Robert Bloomfield (1766-1823) composed a poem
called 'The Farmer's Boy' - the boy being called 'Giles'. The
work, greatly admired at the time, is now forgotten but the
name 'Giles' has stuck.
Next: How is it pronounced? In most cases with a hard 'G-' as
in 'got'. Names spoken thus will be discussed here. Those
sounding as 'Jill' have a very complicated history and must
be deferred until the next issue.
Bearers of the name in Derbyshire might be justifiably
tempted to think that it was related in some way to a form of
measure used for tin. An old commentary relating to tin-mining
certainly says: "They measure Tynne by the Gill,
Toplippe, Dish and Foote". However the first instance in
print dates from 1602 and while no doubt the expression might
have been used by miners long before that date, it is
difficult to see how it could have insinuated its way into a
surname. The pronunciation also tells against it.
The most assured of all derivations is that 'Gill' is an
adaptation of an early English expression which signified 'a
young boy' involving the sense of 'a boy about the place
hired for general duties'. It is still detectable in
'pageboy', 'bellboy' etc. It then later took on an extended
meaning as a 'servant' and evolved then as both an
occupational and a personal name. It still survives in
current Scots as 'gillie' and the earliest recorded forms
otherwise are 'Gilla' (old Irish) and 'Gilli' (old Norse).
Beyond that, its ultimate source is unknown. The first naming
appears in Yorkshire (1185) for Garnet filius Gille. It was
adopted into many surnames with the meaning 'servant of-'
such as 'Gillespie' which takes the Latin form 'episcopus'
(bishop) and yields `Servant of the Bishop'. Religious names
abound, as Gilies (Jesus) Gilchrist (Christ) Gilmore (Mary)
and Gilmartin (Martin). Because our own region became under
the influence of Scandinavian incursions, the form 'gilli' is
very likely to have been the source of the surname in many
cases.
However one has only to travel to the North-Western areas and
there one will find that a different explanation may hold.
Here the word 'gill' is still in dialect use and describes a
ravine, which is a deep wooded valley with a stream. The
derivation of the word is curious. It is claimed to have come
from an Old Norse expression 'gjolnar' which refers to the
gills of fishes. Apparently our Northern ancestors detected a
fanciful resemblance between the organs of breathing in
fishes and a deep ravine. The point is not convincingly
settled.
Although these declivities are a familiar characteristic of
the landscape of the north-western counties and the Ridings
of Yorkshire, very few bear names which are known much beyond
the immediate vicinity. This is hardly surprising because
gills did not lend themselves to extensive development: space
is restricted and access difficult. Even today there are only
a few places which have attained a status beyond that of a
hamlet. An eminent authority on English place-names states
that 'gill' is largely found in neighbourhood names and can
list barely half-a-dozen which attained any size. The early
inhabitants would have been known in the district a 'the folk
who live in't gill' and if a man moved away to seek a living
elsewhere in the area, he would have been identified as 'him
from the gill' which eventually gave rise to the surname
'gill'.
So, unless families called 'Gill' can point specifically to
the place associated with their predecessors, they could have
emanated from any of the numerous deep valleys which abound
in the region. In Scotland there is a reference to a Patrick
del Gyle (1296) which is interpreted as 'Patrick of the
Ravine'. Its site can no longer be pin-pointed but it is
believed to be in the County of Peebles. On top of that, the
name itself is regarded as an import from Cumberland. In
England the earliest reference is to an Elias de la Gyle
(Yorkshire: 1269). Of extended surnames possibly Ramskill
(ie. Ramsgill) near Pateley Bridge and Scargill (near Barnard
Castle) are certainly familiar.
It is interesting to note that the spelling 'Ghyll' is not
authentic. It was contrived by the poet Wordsworth in 1787.
To be continued...
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 4th November 2002.
|
Are you called GILL?
(Part Two)
Our medieval ancestors were as much given to using pet or
family names as we are. Examples: Tony for Anthony; Betty for
Elizabeth. Technically they are called "hypocorisms".
Sometimes they evolved into surnames: Henry James (novelist),
Augustus John (artist) for instance. But some of the medieval
hypocorisms are difficult and frequently impossible to relate
to any personal name and when such forms have been adopted as
surnames, there are problems.
This is the case with "Gill". If bearers of the name
pronounce it with a soft "G-" then it may be suggested that
it is derived from one of the numerous hypocorisms for
"Julian" or "Giles". But if with a hard "G-" then,
discounting the alternatives previously discussed in the
preceding issue of the "Advertiser" it could be "William".
The personal name "Julian" was susceptible to innumerable
hypocorisms which it would be tedious to list either
exhaustively or conclusively. The name itself was inherited
from the late Latin "Julianus" which had itself been
constructed on the classical name "Julius". The meaning is
obscure. It is curious that although the name had unpleasing
associations, it still stood high. After all the celebrated
Julius Caesar was assassinated: Didius Julianus was the
unfortunate bidder when the world was put up for auction
(A.D. 92): the Emperor Julain (331-363) distrusted the narrow
dogmatism of the early Christian church and actively
encouraged liberal and eclectic thought: ever after he was
spitefully dubbed "the apostate". However, these reputations
were probably counterbalanced from the name also being
identifiable with several minor saints and holy men - amongst
whom Julian the Hospitaller stood very high. He regularly
features in medieval art and was a patron of travellers and
inn-keepers. The fact that many churches and hospitals were
dedicated to him demonstrates the popularity of the name.
"Julian" was both a boy's and girl's name - vide St. Julian
of Norwich (1342-1413) a female recluse in whose life and
religious writings ever-increasing interest is still being
shown. (Note: the specifically feminine "Gillian" only
emerged in the 1500s.) At this point it may be relevant to
draw attention to the fact that scribes in the Middle Ages
relied on an alphabet which they inherited from Latin and in
which the letter "j" was not present. It was invariably
represented by "I" - hence "Jesus" is often seen in art as
"IESVS" (there was no "u" as we know it as well!) The initial
"I" frequently modulated into "G". Thus in Italian "Julian"
becomes "Guiliano" whereas in southern Italy, "Iuliano". The
linguistic manoeuvres are too complicated to be described
briefly. It is suggested that may have been involved in the
transitions to "Gill". A few variations may be mentioned:
Julyan, Jolanus, Jollan, Jellin, Jull, Joll etc. As a first
name "Giles" was less popular and only recorded before the
close of the 14th century, when our first astronomer is
mentioned, Giles of St. Albans. The origins of the name are
confused, but, briefly are based on Germanic words signifying
"worthiness". They gave rise to such names as Gisel, Gilo,
Ghilo - all recorded before Domesday (1086).
It seems that when the Norman scribes tried to Latinise these
forms, they appear to have compounded them with "Egidus"
which was the name of a 7th-century hermit in Provence and
whose name was thus, it is suggested, back-translated into
Giles. This "Giles" is an authenticated personage, leading a
life of exemplary holiness and to whom miraculous healing
powers attributed - especially with the disabled. He was
adopted patron saint of Edinburgh, to whose cathedral as well
as some 162 country-wide parish churches are dedicated.
Possibly because he was the patron of cripples and beggars,
there was diffidence in taking his name in baptism and it was
not as popular as might be imagined among the English.
Finally: "Gill" pronounced with a hard "G-"? Of which name
might it be a hypocorism? Surprisingly it is "William"! This
was not a native English name. It had been introduced into
the community by the Normans who in turn had borrowed it from
the German "Wilhelm" (interpreted as: he who is armed with
the will to succeed.) As previously observed, Norman-French
was derived from Latin and as with other languages from that
source had no letter in the alphabet to correspond with "W-".
The Normans sought to approximate it through combining it
with "G-" giving "Go-" and rendering "William" as "Guillaume"
(compare Spanish; Guillermo, they pronounced it as "geeyom").
Although the name was strongly identified with the hated
invader, William I (the Conqueror) it nevertheless became one
of the most popular of boys' names until the 13th century,
when it was overtaken by John. Of course it had innumerable
variations, particularly Gilot (1292) and Guylote (1319).
Note: "Bill" was not used as a hypocorism during the Middle
Ages and so the surname "Bill" is not involved.
Without doubt the name most appreciated by our male
readership may be brought on stage and diffidently presented
as an example of a derived surname. A feminine form of "Gill"
was "Gillet" which modified to "Gillette" and was borne by
the American inventor King Gillette (1855-1932) who conferred
upon half the population of the civilised world the blessings
of the safety razor.
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 18th November 2002.
|