CLARKE
This is a copy of an article published in
The Peak Advertiser, the Peak District's local free newspaper,
on 9th May 1994,
reproduced by kind permission of the author, the late Desmond Holden.
The “What's in a Name” series was a regular
feature in the Advertiser over the period 1993‑2004,
taking a refreshing look at the derivation of some typically
Derbyshire surnames.
Articles are confined to the origins and meanings of surnames,
and do not indicate any particular interest on Desmond's part in
the genealogy, descent, or family history of individuals bearing
the surnames featured.
Editor's Note: Articles are provided for general interest and
background only. They are not intended to provide an exhaustive treatise
for any individual family history - investigations of which may yield
quite different results. Or, in Desmond's own words:
“In the end it must remain with individual bearers of the names to
draw upon family traditions and to seek out such documentary
evidence as is available to decide the matter for themselves.”
WHAT'S IN A NAME …
Are you called CLARKE?
This is a professional name - that is to say, the original
bearers were - "clerks". Vocational names are very widespread -
of which "Smith" stands easily the first. This is not surprising
because in early settlements there was always a "smith" and a
"baker" and a "miller". Those who followed such occupations would
eventually adopt them as their surnames. Since there was very much
of a tendency for these and other basic trades to remain in
families, the bits tagged-on, such as "-son" were rarely needed.
For example, in the local directories there are nearly 5,000 Smiths
yet only a handful under "Smithson".
Very much the same applies to "Clarke". Every village would have
had its Church and to every Church there would be attached a
"clerk". Similarly as in the case of the trades just mentioned, the
job would pass from father to son. Hence, while there are nearly
1,000 entries against "Clarke", there are about a dozen for
"Clarkson".
Of course we all know what work would have been carried on by the
ancestors of our "Smiths", "Bakers" and "Millers". But what did a
"clerk" do - especially in the Middle Ages when there would have
been very little call for the sort of secretarial work and
accountancy which we associate with a "clerk" today. Furthermore,
if a "clerk" was involved with the village church, and in the
Catholic Church no Minister is permitted to marry, then how could
the name have been passed down a family?
The fact is that although "clerks" certainly performed religious
duties they were not in "Full Orders" but only in what are termed
"Minor Orders". One of their specified duties was to assist at
services and to read out appointed passages from the Bible and,
when required, Edicts and Proclamations. This means that a "clerk"
was one of the limited number of persons of the time who could read
and write. And: although the Church fostered scholarship and
learning, not every fully ordained priest was able to read! Even
upper clergy, such as the Bishop of Durham (1316), could not read
nor understand the Latin of services they were supposed to conduct!
So the ability to read and write became closely identified with
"clerks" and from thence took on all its extended meanings.
Strangely enough, there is some uncertainty as to how the word
"clerk" came into being. Like "cleric" and "clergy" it can be
traced to a Greek root-word "kleros" - for which the best modern
equivalent could be "heritage". It seems that Priests were assumed
to have no interest in worldly goods. Their only possession (i.e.
their "heritage") was their vocation: see Deuteronomy XVIII:2.
The pronunciation of "clerk" is reproduced in the spelling of
"Clarke". This is because in the old Home Counties dialect, the
sound "err" modified to "ah" - as in "sergeant" and "Hertford", and
this pronunciation prevailed. But the correct sound still exists in
"clergy" and "cleric"; and in North America "clerk" still rhymes
with "work".
Under the influence of the "ah" pronunciation, former writers,
including Shakespeare, tended to spell it "clerk", but the
"professionals" wanted to show off their Latin and reverted to
"clerk" and by so doing, set up a conflict between how it was
written and how it was said! A slightly similar development occurs
in the case of the name: "Taylor" - which is the old spelling of
both trade and surname; and "tailor" which the professionals later
insisted upon to show it came from the French "tailler" - to cut.
People whose ancestors followed the occupation of "clerk" and who
came from the Continent - possibly as Law Court officials or in
Norman households, at the time of the Conquest, sometimes reveal
this in their names being "Leclerc" or "Declerk". It is suggested
that the Victorian attitude of the "white-collar-clerks" towards
the "blue-collared- workers" brought upon them the charge that they
fancied themselves as "Gentry" (see "Diary of a Nobody - 6th and
7th April). It is not difficult, then, to see why so many men,
particularly in the Armed Services, if called "Clarke" invariably
attract the nickname - conferred in good-humour, naturally -, of
"Nobby Clarke".
Otherwise, except in the case of the ill-fated Jeremiah Clarke
(1669-1709) who wrote the ever-popular "Trumpet Voluntary",
although the name Clarke, with its few variations - which are not
significant - is one of the most widely distributed names in the
British-speaking world, only a few have secured entries in the
reference books, and none became a household name.
Site Index
|
© Desmond Holden
From "The Peak Advertiser", 9th May 1994.
|